<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AJAX vs. Flash vs. Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.AskReaMaor.com/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.AskReaMaor.com/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/</link>
	<description>Your one-stop-blog for all latest Technology News updates and interpretation, heck, we'll even teach you how to Make Money Online and wrap it up with some WordPress blogging tips.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: diseño web</title>
		<link>http://www.AskReaMaor.com/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/comment-page-1/#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>diseño web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askreamaor.com/computer-related/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/#comment-5389</guid>
		<description>Not why they compare AJAX with Flash, fodder that are not due to compare since both have great differences. Each of them has advantages marked according to the project to realise for that reason I insist on saying that they would not be due to compare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not why they compare AJAX with Flash, fodder that are not due to compare since both have great differences. Each of them has advantages marked according to the project to realise for that reason I insist on saying that they would not be due to compare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.AskReaMaor.com/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 14:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askreamaor.com/computer-related/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/#comment-805</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yet a year after Sun open-sourced Java, under the same GPL as free Unix systems&quot;

This is not true. Sun *announced* that it was open sourcing Java (called OpenJDK) one year ago. They only just now open sourced the codebase at JavaOne 4 weeks ago. 

&quot;and not one new Linux distro has bothered to glance at it.&quot;

Both Ubuntu and Redhat are working on including OpenJDK right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yet a year after Sun open-sourced Java, under the same GPL as free Unix systems&#8221;</p>
<p>This is not true. Sun *announced* that it was open sourcing Java (called OpenJDK) one year ago. They only just now open sourced the codebase at JavaOne 4 weeks ago. </p>
<p>&#8220;and not one new Linux distro has bothered to glance at it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Both Ubuntu and Redhat are working on including OpenJDK right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coop Search</title>
		<link>http://www.AskReaMaor.com/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/comment-page-1/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Coop Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 03:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askreamaor.com/computer-related/programming/ajax-vs-flash-vs-java/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>I saw  www.springwidgets.com, it can mostly be classified as AFLAX..

But a few security issues are yet to be resolved. For example when google gadgets were released, the content of the Google personalized page could be changed at will by third party web sites..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw  <a href="http://www.springwidgets.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.springwidgets.com</a>, it can mostly be classified as AFLAX..</p>
<p>But a few security issues are yet to be resolved. For example when google gadgets were released, the content of the Google personalized page could be changed at will by third party web sites..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

